A Supreme Court decision does not establish a "supreme law of the land" that is binding on all persons and parts of government, henceforth and forevermore. Edwin Meese More Quotes by Edwin Meese More Quotes From Edwin Meese You don't have many suspects who are innocent of a crime. That's contradictory. If a person is innocent of a crime, then he is not a suspect. Edwin Meese contradictory innocent crime Suspects who are innocent of a crime should. But the thing is, you don't have many suspects who are innocent of a crime. That's contradictory. If a person is innocent of a crime, then he is not a suspect. Edwin Meese police giving people Ascribing racial animus to people who are trying to safeguard democratic integrity is a crude yet effective political tactic that obscures the truth. But there's something even worse than name-calling: legal interference from Washington with valid laws. Edwin Meese law names integrity You couldn't even prove the White House staff sane beyond a reasonable doubt. Edwin Meese doubt white house I was attorney general; my name is Meese. I say, go to college. Don't carry a piece. Edwin Meese pieces college names The idea that the police cannot ask questions of the person that knows most about the crime is an infamous decision. Edwin Meese police decision ideas [Nuclear war]... may not be desirable. Edwin Meese nuclear may war Constitutional interpretation is not the business of the Court only, but also properly the business of all branches of government. Edwin Meese court branches government As a former U.S. attorney general under President Reagan, and a former Ohio secretary of state, we would like to say something that might strike some as obvious: Those who oppose photo voter-ID laws and other election-integrity reforms are intent on making it easier to commit vote fraud. Edwin Meese ohio law integrity An expert is somebody who is more than 50 miles from home, has no responsibility for implementing the advice he gives, and shows slides. Edwin Meese responsibility home giving Attorney General Eric Holder, who announced his resignation on Thursday, leaves a dismal legacy at the Justice Department, but one of his legal innovations was especially pernicious: the demonizing of state attempts to ensure honest elections. Edwin Meese thursday innovation justice The implication that everyone would have to accept its judgments uncritically, that it was a decision from which there could be no appeal, was astonishing. Edwin Meese judgment accepting decision Nicaragua is fast becoming a terrorist country club. Edwin Meese nicaragua clubs country That conclusion is inescapable, given the well-established evidence that voter-ID laws don't disenfranchise minorities or reduce minority voting, and in many instances enhance it, despite claims to the contrary by Mr. Holder and his allies. As more states adopt such laws, the left has railed against them with increasing fury, even invoking the specter of the Jim Crow era to describe electoral safeguards common to most nations, including in the Third World. Edwin Meese crow voting law And they failed... And he did all this to position himself to run for governor of Massachusetts. Hes doing a similar thing against President Trump. The man is utterly unprincipled. And Ill prove it to you. Edwin Meese latest-headlines As Alexander Hamilton said in 'The Federalist Papers,' law is about the exercise of judgment and not will. Judicial activism is best understood as substituting judicial opinion for the command of law. The law is not an infinitely malleable tool. Edwin Meese will best opinion law It should be remembered that the president cannot, by executive order, do things that affects the public at large unless there is some Congressional basis for it. Edwin Meese cannot some things president America was founded to be a beacon of liberty, particularly religious liberty. The framers of our Constitution sought to preserve religious liberty to such an extent that they made it the first right protected in the Bill of Rights. Edwin Meese right constitution liberty america The United States is in a time of transition. Courts have redefined marriage, and beliefs about human sexuality are changing. Will the right to dissent be protected? Will the right of Americans to speak and act in accord with what the United States had always believed about marriage - that it's a union of husband and wife - be tolerated? Edwin Meese marriage wife husband time In most countries, you have a monarch or some other principal person to whom its officers and its military swear their allegiance. Our officials in this country and our military swear allegiance to the Constitution. We say that when we say the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Edwin Meese you principal constitution country
![[Nuclear war]... may not be desirable. by Edwin Meese](https://whatsmyquote.com/images/quote-medium-quote-df877e6bf1d0bb8ccc590c7124542e53.jpg)
