You do not understand your own tradition if you do not see it in relation to others. John Searle More Quotes by John Searle More Quotes From John Searle It seemed to a number of philosophers of language, myself included, that we should attempt to achieve a unification of Chomsky's syntax, with the results of the researches that were going on in semantics and pragmatics. I believe that this effort has proven to be a failure. Though Chomsky did indeed revolutionize the subject of linguistics, it is not at all clear, at the end the century, what the solid results of this revolution are. As far as I can tell there is not a single rule of syntax that all, or even most, competent linguists are prepared to agree is a rule. John Searle effort numbers believe The reason that no computer program can ever be a mind is simply that a computer program is only syntactical, and minds are more than syntactical. Minds are semantical, in the sense that they have more than a formal structure, they have a content. John Searle computer reason mind You can't *discover* that the brain is a digital computer. You can only *interpret* the brain as a digital computer. John Searle digital computer brain We do not live in several different, or even two different, worlds, a mental world and a physical world, a scientific world and a world of common sense. Rather, there is just one world; it is the world we all live in, and we need to account for how we exist as part of it. John Searle common-sense two knowledge Because we do not understand the brain very well we are constantly tempted to use the latest technology as a model for trying to understand it. In my childhood we were always assured that the brain was a telephone switchboard...Sherrington, the great British neuroscientist, thought the brain worked like a telegraph system. Freud often compared the brain to hydraulic and electromagnetic systems. Leibniz compared it to a mill...At present, obviously, the metaphor is the digital computer. John Searle childhood technology science The problem posed by indirect speech acts is the problem of how it is possible for the speaker to say one thing and mean that but also to mean something else. John Searle speech problem mean Many people mistakenly suppose that the essence of consciousness is that of a control mechanism John Searle consciousness essence people "Akrasia" [weakness of will] in rational beings is as common as wine in France. John Searle france weakness wine Where consciousness is concerned, the appearance is the reality. John Searle consciousness appearance reality Whatever is referred to must exist. Let us call this the axiom of existence. John Searle axioms existence In the performance of an illocutionary act in the literal utterance of a sentence, the speaker intends to produce a certain effect by means of getting the hearer to recognize his intention to produce that effect; and furthermore, if he is using the words literally, he intends this recognition to be achieved in virtue of the fact that the rules for using the expressions he utters associate the expression with the production of that effect. John Searle utterance expression mean An utterance can have Intentionality, just as a belief has Intentionality, but whereas the Intentionality of the belief is intrinsic the Intentionality of the utterance is derived. John Searle intentionality utterance belief There is no success or failure in Nature. John Searle success-or-failure Where questions of style and exposition are concerned I try to follow a simple maxim: if you can't say it clearly you don't understand it yourself. John Searle style simple trying The Intentionality of the mind not only creates the possibility of meaning, but limits its forms. John Searle possibility limits mind Nowadays nobody bothers, and it is considered in slightly bad taste to even raise the question of God's existence. Matters of religion are like matters of sexual preference: they are not discussed in public, and even the abstract questions are discussed only by bores. John Searle abstract taste matter Where conscious subjectivity is concerned, there is no distinction between the observation and the thing observed. John Searle subjectivity objectivity conscious Dualism makes the problem insoluble; materialism denies the existence of any phenomenon to study, and hence of any problem. John Searle materialism study problem If you can't say it clearly, you don't understand it yourself John Searle ifs Well, what does "good" mean anyway? As Wittgenstein suggested, "good," like "game," has a family of meanings. Prominent among them is this one: "meets the criteria or standards of assessment or evaluation." John Searle assessment games mean
!["Akrasia" [weakness of will] in rational beings is as common as w... by John Searle](https://whatsmyquote.com/images/quote-medium-quote-975dbe9e5e8ea90549299f401e2d8c5f.jpg)
![](https://service.weibo.com/share/share.php?url=https://whatsmyquote.com/quote/akrasia-weakness-of-will-in-rational-beings-is-as-common-as-wine-in-france&appkey=&title=John Searle quote: "Akrasia" [weakness of will] in rational beings is as common as wine in France.&pic=https://whatsmyquote.com/images/quote-975dbe9e5e8ea90549299f401e2d8c5f.jpg&ralateUid=&language=zh_cn){kind=link}
![](https://pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https://whatsmyquote.com/quote/akrasia-weakness-of-will-in-rational-beings-is-as-common-as-wine-in-france&description="Akrasia" [weakness of will] in rational beings is as common as wine in France.&media=https://whatsmyquote.com/images/quote-975dbe9e5e8ea90549299f401e2d8c5f.jpg){kind=link}
