Although there are private communications contained in the warrants, they prove no crime. I have no trepidation about their release, there is, to this day, no evidence that I had or knew about the source or content of the Wikileaks disclosures prior to their public release.

Roger Stone

I have testified truthfully before the House Intelligence Committee that Randy Credico was the source who confirmed Assange's June 2016 CNN interview in which the Wikileaks publisher said he had substantial information on Hillary Clinton, as I testified Randy Credico told me this material would be released in October. I now realize that Credico's source was a Wikileaks lawyer and not Assange himself. At no time did Randy Credico tell me what the source, content or scope of the WikiLeaks disclosures would be. I would note that Randy Credico has avoided testifying on these matters under oath. If Randy Credico is compelled to testify I would urge Randy Credico to simply tell the truth.

I have consistently urged Randy Credico to simply tell the truth, our bickering can sometimes be sarcastic, but I have never urged Randy Credico not to cooperate with any formal inquiry.

I have no ties to Russia, i have no Russian contacts. by Roger Stone

I have no ties to Russia, i have no Russian contacts.

I Roger Stone had no contacts or communications with the Russian state, Russian intelligence or anyone fronting for them or acting as intermediaries for them.

I sleep well at night because I know what I have and have not done, there's no inappropriate activity pertaining to Russian collusion. I obtained nothing from WikiLeaks or Julian Assange. I never passed anything on to WikiLeaks or Julian Assange.

I never had possession or access to any Clinton emails or records... by Roger Stone

I never had possession or access to any Clinton emails or records.

It is not inconceivable now that Mr. Robert Mueller and Robert Mueller team may seek to conjure up some extraneous crime, pertaining to my business, or maybe not even pertaining to the 2016 election.

I don't think the President regarded him as a political genius or was open to his desires in that area.

I never dined with Assange. by Roger Stone

I never dined with Assange.

And now we see that it’s not. So why my request hasn’t been granted — I’m frankly flummoxed by it. we even proposed, you know, as a compromise, that they just agree to publish them unedited the very next day.

latest-headlines

I am one who had publicly defended Bannon from false charges of racism and anti-Semitism yet I have concluded he is a spent force, never being willing to spend his political capital to help his friends and in some cases helping empower the very globalists he claims to oppose.

latest-headlines

The people you are referring to are the same people that said there were weapons of mass destruction and (Saddam) Hussein had them, who lied about rendition, who lied about torture at Abu Ghraib.

The inference that my now completely public exchange with a hacker Guccifer 2.0 who may or may not be a Russian agent somehow constitutes collusion is not true based on either the facts, on the actual texts which I released, or on the timing.

Let me have my day in court. by Roger Stone

Let me have my day in court.

Chairman Schiff is engaging in the worst kind of red baiting, fear mongering, it's the new McCarthyism, and it's mudslinging.

This is does not constitute collusion. by Roger Stone

This is does not constitute collusion.

I am anxious to rebut allegations that I had any improper or nefarious contact with any agent of the Russia state based on facts -- not misleading and salacious headlines, i am willing to appear voluntarily if the committee isn't looking for the headline of issuing a subpoena.

The intelligence agencies pushing this false Russian narrative through a series of illegal hacks have hurt my ability to make a living and are soiling my reputation, the government is in possession of no evidence whatsoever that I colluded with the Russian State. Any inference that my innocuous fully disclosed Twitter exchange and tweets with a hacker known as Gruccifer 2.0 (sic), who may not may not be a Russian asset, constitutes 'collusion' is disproved by the content, the facts and the timeline of events.

I think we have widespread voter fraud, i think he has to put [voters] on notice that their inauguration will be a rhetorical. And when I mean civil disobedience, not violence, but it will be a bloodbath. The government will be shut down if they attempt to steal this and swear Hillary in.

They're going to be confronted every day, on radio, on television... by Roger Stone

They're going to be confronted every day, on radio, on television, on billboards.