Any presentation to a grand jury -- without the prosecutor advocating for Tamir -- is a charade, to get so-called experts to assist in the whitewash -- when the world has the video of what happened -- is all the more alarming.

Subodh Chandra

Categorized in : Top News

This case goes to the heart of what it means to be an American, we have not only the right to criticize government, but to mock it mercilessly.

Eight days for gross negligence resulting in the death of a 12-ye... by Subodh Chandra

Eight days for gross negligence resulting in the death of a 12-year-old boy, how pathetic is that?

Fat chance of this absurd discipline deterring anyone from anything other than continued incompetence and indifference, that the dispatcher still has her job when a child is dead speaks volumes about accountability in Cleveland.

If this is the best that that system can offer, then the system i... by Subodh Chandra

If this is the best that that system can offer, then the system is broken.

The issue of secondary employment is of no real interest to us, and it is an example of the city providing the appearance of doing something when it actually doesn't hold anyone accountable.

Loehmann, for example insists that he observed things and took action that would have been physically impossible for any human being to do in the under two seconds it took him to shoot a 12-year-old child.

She had the opportunity to ask the grand jury to consider whether it could possibly be 'reasonable' or 'justifiable' for officers to speed across the grass when driveways were nearby, rush up to Tamir, and shoot him immediately.

The view expressed in those reports that the killing of Tamir Rice was reasonable and justified is nothing short of preposterous.

Reasonable jurors could find that conduct unreasonable. by Subodh Chandra

Reasonable jurors could find that conduct unreasonable.

Justice for the family would be to prosecute the officers who killed their child.