It's going to be something every day from now until the election about how he's not doing this right, or he's not following this right, i think he's doing a good job on this.

Josh Hawley

There seems to be a majority of justices who are ready to uphold Mississippi’s law, i think that in of itself is quite significant.

I think the people of all the states would like to be able to say that, ‘ Hey, I ’d like to have a voice in this, ’ and the people have n’t had a voice in 50 years.

I promise you what it won't mean, the people whose privacy won't be protected are normal Americans who want to express their views, particularly if they have conservative views. I promise you that their privacy won't be respected, they'll still get censored.

The left want to define traditional masculinity as toxic, they want to define the traditional masculine virtues -- things like courage and independence and assertiveness -- as a danger to society.

This could be a political earthquake.

I certainly share your view that threats of violence have no place in this country, but the backdrop of your memo strongly suggests that your concern is not violence, but democratic pushback against critical race theory.

Big tech has embraced a business model of addiction. Too much of the' innovation' in this space is designed not to create better products, but to capture more attention by using psychological tricks that make it difficult to look away, this legislation will put an end to that and encourage true innovation by tech companies.

If proven, these acts could amount to the unauthorized taking and use of property -- in this case electronic property. Under Missouri law, this is known as computer tampering and given the value of the list in question, it is a felony.

Eric Greitens know what I'm talking about, the 1960s, 1970s, it became commonplace in our culture among our cultural elites, Hollywood, and the media to talk about -- to denigrate the biblical truth about husband and wife, man and woman.

These are working people. ... and all that they ask for, as I have said many times on this floor before, is a chance to get back up on their feet and be able to provide for their families, and I can't for the life of me understand why Both Hawley and Sanders can not get so much as a vote on these bills.

Milions of voters concerned about election integrity deserve to be heard, i will object on January 6 on their behalf.

I can not vote to certify Electoral College results on January 6 without raising the fact that some states, particularly Pennsylvania, failed to follow their own state election laws, at the very least, Congress should investigate allegations of voter fraud and adopt measures to secure the integrity of our elections. But Congress has so far failed to act.

I will just say to Republicans : Good luck explaining to your voters if you fast-track nominees for somebody who isn't even President yet, i mean, Joe Biden has not been sworn in. Good luck explaining that.

Terrible idea, i would never support that.

Maybe we can put to rest this attempt to constantly leverage the worst interpretations of Justice Scalia's philosophy, misrepresentations, and attribute them all to you, as if you are the same person.

I think in my case, that made a big difference.

I think we have a different set of circumstances. We have a President who is very actively running for reelection, he's going to be on the ballot. People are going to be able to render a verdict on him like they couldn't on Obama. My guess is he would absolutely nominate somebody. I would be shocked if he didn't.

Not really, i don't know why Sen. Chuck Schumer and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who I respect, I don't know why they should control the administration's choice of who the right nominee for that position should be. I don't particularly agree with that.

There's clearly some animus here towards the President. I think that's pretty apparent on both sides, i just think that there's a lot of desire for publicity here. ... I think you've got to take this with a grain of salt.

I was surprised at his method of reaching a conclusion. You can tell he's sensitive about it because he goes to some length to say,' No, I really am a textualist and this is a textualist approach,'.