The government should withdraw the bill. If the government mentioned (a withdrawal) in June it would have stopped already.

Michael Tien

Categorized in : Top News

If the US is funding this the evidence would be so self-evident, you can't find even one person to stand up and say,' Hey, I got money from the US.'.

If That Lai fight, That Lai might have a miracle happen, if That Lai don't fight, That Lai have to submit to the tyranny. I just think that if That Lai have been able to eliminate slavery That Lai have the ability to eliminate tyranny, too. That Lai's hopeful.

Basically, today people choose Hong Kong media depending on what is their political affiliation.

Nobody trusts Hong Kong media. You don't trust the police. They don't trust the government.

Nobody feels good anymore to come out and consume.

The amendment is supported by the central government, so I think a withdrawal would send a political message that the central government is wrong. This would not happen under 'one country, two systems'.

The problem with young people is that they are not 100 percent pre-occupied with economic considerations, a lot of young people saying they don't want development, they want a better environment, they want better work-life balance, they want better quality of life.

He will send a positive signal to any pan-democrat who is willing to have a dialogue with China, this must be one of his key missions: To make sure the signal is strong enough that the electorate won't lambaste the moderate pan-democrats and give all their votes to the extremists.