To have ideals is not the same as to have impracticable ideals. Susan Stebbing More Quotes by Susan Stebbing More Quotes From Susan Stebbing The opposite of thinking clearly is being muddled. To be conscious of being muddled is a horrible experience. To avoid it we may even be tempted to shut our minds and swallow a belief, ready-made, from some expert authority. Susan Stebbing mindoppositesthinking We easily fall into the habit of accepting compressed statements which save us from the trouble of thinking. Thus arises what I shall call 'Potted Thinking'. Susan Stebbing troublefallthinking It is not swinish to be happy unless one is happy in swinish ways. Susan Stebbing happinessway There is an urgent need to-day for the citizens of a democracy to think well. It is not enough to have freedom of the Press and parliamentary institutions. Our difficulties are due partly to our own stupidity, partly to the exploitation of that stupidity, and partly to our own prejudices and personal desires. Susan Stebbing stupiditydesirethinking We come to think of an idealist as one who seeks to realize what is not in fact realizable. But, it is necessary to insist, to have ideals is not the same as to have impracticable ideals, however often it may be the case that our ideals are impracticable. Susan Stebbing mayfactsthinking It is an illusion to suppose that a Dictator makes himself; at most he seizes an opportunity made for him by passive, stupid, incompetent, and above all, unsatisfied and fearful men. Susan Stebbing stupidopportunitymen A system is said to be coherent if every fact in the system is related every other fact in the system by relations that are not merely conjunctive. A deductive system affords a good example of a coherent system. Susan Stebbing examplesaidfacts
