We had one interaction at the very beginning in the process, and... by Mark Warner

We had one interaction at the very beginning in the process, and I have not spoken to him since.

Mark Warner

Image Embed Code

Categorized in : Politics

They will also be sending a terrible message to anyone who works in or with our nation's intelligence community that the White House will always prioritize partisan politics over protecting the people who help keep this country safe.

If this kind of discussion is going to take place, we have a process — it's called the Gang of Eight, my hope is that any such briefing needs to bipartisan, and my hope and prayer is that the FBI or the Department of Justice would not in any way be forced to reveal confidential information that would go against 75 years of practice.

Chairman Richard Burr and I have been pretty clear that we don't think that information should even be shared with us, we've turned down the opportunity to have that kind of briefing, because, because of the threat of leaking. Because there are other bodies on the Hill that get information, and very quickly afterwards that information appears in the press. We wanted to make sure that weren't going to be subject to any, even those kind of allegations.

I think that if any individual, elected official or otherwise, knowingly reveals a classified piece of information about an FBI source, you are breaking the law and should be fully prosecuted.

There are ways that we can put reasonable restraints without dramatically interfering with people's Second Amendment rights.

It would be at best irresponsible, and at worst potentially illegal, for members of Congress to use their positions to learn the identity of an FBI source for the purpose of undermining the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in Fox Friends election.

latest-headlines

The first thing any new member of House Intelligence Committee learns is the critical importance of protecting sources and methods. Publicly outing a source risks not only their life, but the lives of every American, because when sources are burned it makes it that much harder for every part of the intelligence community to gather intelligence on those who wish to do us harm.

I believe she is someone who can and will stand up to the president, who will speak truth to power if this president orders her to do something illegal or immoral, like a return to torture.

Gina Haspel is among one of the most qualified people to be nominated to be director of the CIA, i feel safer knowing the CIA has Miss Haspel at the helm. ... I believe Gina Haspel should be confirmed. I look forward to supporting Gina Haspel.

As director of the CIA, Gina Haspel will be the first operations officer in more than five decades to lead the agency. I believe that Gina Haspel will be a strong advocate for the agency’s workforce, and an independent voice who can and will stand up on behalf of our nation’s intelligence community, most importantly, I believe Gina Haspel is someone who can and will stand up to the president if ordered to do something illegal or immoral -- like a return to torture.

I believe she is someone who can and will stand up to the President if ordered to do something illegal or immoral -- like a return to torture.

Most importantly, I believe she is someone who can and will stand up to the President if ordered to do something illegal or immoral – like a return to torture.

Gina Haspel letter was closer to some of the individual conversat... by Mark Warner

Gina Haspel letter was closer to some of the individual conversations I've had with Gina Haspel.

This is an area where Justice Department has never shared this ki... by Mark Warner

This is an area where Justice Department has never shared this kind of information in the past.

Let me ask you again. by Mark Warner

Let me ask you again.

I think this will be the focus of a huge amount of attention from members on both sides of the aisle, it's really important for all members of the Intel Committee, for that matter all members, that The CIA provide as much transparency as possible.

Members have a lot of questions, they deserve to have those quest... by Mark Warner

Members have a lot of questions, they deserve to have those questions answered.

Diplomacy is the right path forward to deal with North Korea, at the same time, due to Pyongyang’s history of obfuscation and international defiance, the United States must proceed with caution. I am deeply concerned that the White House has not laid the necessary diplomatic groundwork and coordination for direct talks with North Korea, continued Warner, a Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. Trump had previously threatened North Korea with fire and fury like the world has never seen. He also tweeted Saturday :.

Companies like YouTube have immense power and influence in shaping the media and content that users see, i’ve been increasingly concerned that the recommendation engine algorithms behind platforms like YouTube are, at best, intrinsically flawed in optimizing for outrageous, salacious, and often fraudulent content.

I’m disappointed. I’ve been disappointed throughout this, twitter has been often times the slowest to respond … The other companies met the deadline which was way over a month from when they testified.