When people try to get as close to the line as possible without going over, some people are going to miss the mark and they are going to go over the line, just like firefighters have to go look when there is smoke, there may not be a fire, but if there is smoke you have got to look.

Preet Bharara

Categorized in : Top News

I'm a big fan of meat. by Preet Bharara

I'm a big fan of meat.

I spoke bluntly about what I had seen in a little over a year as United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. To the apparent surprise of many in the room, I observed publicly that insider trading appeared to be rampant.

southern new-york years

From coast to coast, the FBI and Securities and Exchange Commission have ensnared people not only at hedge funds, but at technology and pharmaceutical companies, consulting and law firms, government agencies, and even a major stock exchange.

agency technology government

The alarm bells sound regularly: cybergeddon; the next Pearl Harbor; one of the greatest existential threats facing the United States. With increasing frequency, these are the grave terms officials invoke about the menace of cybercrime - and they're not understating the threat.

bells next pearls

I don't see what the privilege is here that prevents him from providing information that is lawfully and appropriately subpoenaed by these three different committees, rudy Giuliani and others in support of the President have gone on television day after day after day saying as the thrust of their argument here that the whistleblower relies on hearsay information, second hand information.

The idea that it is OK, separate and apart from it being a criminal offense, that we should be telling future candidates in the run-up to an election in 2020 that if an adversary, a foreign adversary, is offering information against a political opponent, that it's okay and right and proper and American and patriotic, it seems he's saying, to take that information and that's okay -- that's an extraordinary statement and I would hope he would retract it.

It's the kind of thing you see in environments in which people do bad things but they don't want to be on the hook and on the record as asking someone to do a bad thing. It happens all the time.

He's a kind of a person who doesn't understand that rules have to operate in a particular way and regular order needs to be followed whether it is recusal or arms length distance between a United States attorney or investigator and the President of the United States.

This is another piece in the puzzle to someone trying to put together a picture of attempted obstruction.

I think if the president decided that he was going to pardon himself, I think that it is almost self-executing impeachment.

I think( if) the President decided he was going to pardon himself, I think that's almost self-executing impeachment, whether or not there is a minor legal argument that some law professor somewhere in a legal journal can make that the President can pardon, that's not what the framers could have intended. That's not what the American people, I think, would be able to stand for.

It’s very flattering that other people have put the thought out there. I’m not putting it out there.

No one knows right now whether there is a provable case of obstru... by Preet Bharara

No one knows right now whether there is a provable case of obstruction.

latest-headlines

Absolutely not. I did not and I would not leak classified informa... by Preet Bharara

Absolutely not. I did not and I would not leak classified information.

I wanted this all to come out, the embarrassing stuff exposes the Russian government's entire money laundering machine.

I wanted it to be on record that there was a deliberate decision to change (his) mind and fire me, particularly given what my office's jurisdiction is.

Part of the reason I said I was not going to resign and be fired was because I want the record to reflect for all time that there was a deliberate decision, not just a bureaucratic sweeping away of what had been there in the past, but a specific decision to change one’s mind and deliberately fire me, particularly given what my office’s jurisdiction is and where my office is situated.

More than two decades after the end of the Cold War, Russian spies still seek to operate in our midst under the cover of secrecy.

To prove a violation of the federal criminal civil rights statute, prosecutors must establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that a law enforcement officer willfully deprived an individual of a constitutional right, meaning that the officer acted with the deliberate and specific intent to do something the law forbids.

Each of these fossils represents a culturally and scientifically important artifact looted from its rightful owner.