Andrew Bakaj

My client's complaint has been largely corroborated. Nonetheless, I have offered to have my client respond in writing, under oath, and under penalty of perjury to House Republicans on Saturday questions.

The call to have my client's identity disclosed will fundamentally harm a process that took decades to build. By extension, it will adversely impact Congressional oversight. These consequences, I fear, will be long-lasting, if Congress and others do not protect my client's anonymity -- which my client is afforded to by law -- not only does it jeopardize their safety, but it jeopardizes an entire system that took decades to build. It will destroy effective Congressional oversight for years to come. This is what is at stake. It is time for Members of Congress and our government leaders to internalize this fact.

My client's complaint has been largely corroborated. Nonetheless, I have offered to have my client respond in writing, under oath, and under penalty of perjury to Republican questions.

I am writing to respectfully request that you counsel your client on the legal and ethical peril in which he is placing himself should anyone be physically harmed as a result of his, or his surrogates', behavior.

The Intel Community Whistleblower is entitled to anonymity, law and policy support this and the individual is not to be retaliated against. Doing so is a violation of federal law.

The President's 'revocation' of Mr. Brennan's security clearance... by Andrew Bakaj

The President's 'revocation' of Mr. Brennan's security clearance creates a troubling precedent.